The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board has easily absorbed recent Congressionally mandated changes to its statute, but outgoing Board Chairman Peter Winokur said yesterday that he feared that more drastic proposals for the Board would be damaging to the Board’s mission. Led by House Republicans, Congress directed the DNFSB to run its recommendations by the Department of Energy and also required the Board to have an Inspector General. Other proposals, like a requirement to force the Board to perform cost-benefit analyses on its recommendations, were met by opposition from Congressional Democrats, but could resurface if the Senate were to be controlled by Republicans. “The board is not the Secretary of Energy,” Winokur said at the Weapons Complex Monitor Decisionmakers’ Forum yesterday. “The Secretary of Energy has the responsibility for putting all of the puzzle pieces together and getting the mission done. The Board provides only one set of inputs. Asking the Board to be doing things like cost-benefit analysis, that begins to intrude on the Secretary’s responsibilities.”
Winokur announced that he was stepping down as the Board’s chairman earlier this month and said he would remain on the Board until new member Daniel Santos was confirmed by the Senate, preserving the five-member Board’s quorum. Yesterday he said he was hopeful Santos would be confirmed quickly, though there are no guarantees the Senate will act on the nomination after the November mid-term elections and Winokur said he would not stay on board in perpetuity. “I can’t stay on the Board forever,” Winokur said. “The Board not having a quorum would be very damaging. We definitely want the Board to have a quorum.”
Partner Content
Jobs