With a 2019 exit date for the aged Chemistry and Metallurgy Research facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory creeping up, the Senate Armed Services Committee is directing the National Nuclear Security Administration to streamline efforts to increase the use of the existing radiological laboratory utility office building and repurpose space within the existing Plutonium Facility. The actions represent the first two phases of Los Alamos’ plutonium capabilities revitalization plan—the third involves building small “modules” for other plutonium work—and a provision included in the committee’s version of the Fiscal Year 2015 National Defense Authorization Act released yesterday directs the NNSA to focus on tasks which support getting out of the CMR facility by 2019. The bill requires NNSA to report to the committee by September on what activities can be accelerated to meet the exit date milestone. “It is important that such streamlining should not in any way degrade reasonable program control and oversight,” the committee said in a report accompanying the bill. “… The intent of streamlining is to avoid deferring tasks that will reduce the risk in either CMR or PF–4, while awaiting broader approvals on critical decisions.” The committee said it supported approaching the third phase as a line item project.
The committee also took a shot at the Uranium Processing Facility, even as it said it supported a scaled-back approach to completing the project. Like Los Alamos’ plutonium plan, such an approach would involve using existing facilities and building smaller modules to help replace Y-12’s 9212 complex, which is expected to be cheaper than building a massive facility to house all of the site’s uranium production needs. Cost estimates ballooned to as high as $19 billion for the project late last year, forcing the NNSA to reassess its options. “The committee looks forward to a conservative cost estimate for the first module in replacing building 9212 but will approach it with trepidation and caution given the past record of this project,” the committee said.
Partner Content
Jobs