EnergySolutions yesterday pointed at the Savannah River Salt Waste Processing Facility contract—where the company is a subcontractor to SWPF contractor Parsons—for much of the blame for its net loss of $0.7 million for the first quarter of 2012. Because of cost overruns on the project, and ongoing contract negotiations between Parsons and the Department of Energy, EnergySolutions had to retract its 2011 fees from the project—about $5.6 million—in the quarter, and could not report any earnings during 2012 to date. “As a minority partner in that project, we were first notified in April by the lead partner [Parsons] that they were running over budget on the construction of a separate plant now under construction, due to cost overruns by their tank fabricator subcontractor, who has since been replaced,” EnergySolutions President and CEO Val Christensen told investors during a conference call yesterday. “As a result, our ability to recognize those fees was also delayed until the lead partner concludes their negotiations with the Department of Energy.” EnergySolutions did not express much confidence that the situation would be resolved soon. “The uncertainty we’re talking about is whether we will be able to recognize the salt waste fees in 2012 or 2013. If we had a high level of certainty that those fees would be recognizable in 2012 because the negotiations by our lead partner [Parsons] are successful, that wouldn’t have had an impact on guidance,” Christensen said. “We’re always conservative, and to the extent that we believe there’s a possibility that we won’t get this resolved and those fees will be recognized into 2013, we decided to bite the bullet now and recognize that in guidance.”
Morning Briefing - May 15, 2023
Visit Archives | Return to Issue PDF
Visit Archives | Return to Issue PDF
Morning Briefing
Article of 4
March 17, 2014
ENERGYSOLUTIONS CITES SWPF CONTRACT FOR MUCH OF Q1 WOES
EnergySolutions reported that revenue for the first quarter of 2012 was down to $490.7 million, compared with record high revenue of $522.3 million in the first quarter of 2011. Gross profit was also down, at $31.7 million for the first quarter of 2012 compared with $49.3 million for the same period of 2011. The company reported that commercial work was anemic but had the possibility of picking up later this year. For government work, however, Christensen painted a bleak picture for 2012. Government group revenue for the first quarter of 2012 fell by $37 million to $42.4 million for the first quarter, compared with $79.4 million in the first quarter of 2011. Income from operations for the Government Group in the first quarter of 2012 was a loss of $5.1 million, compared with income of $1.9 million for the first quarter of 2011. In the call, Christensen said the completion of the Uranium Disposition Services project and the Portsmouth Gas Diffusion Plant remediation project in March 2011, as well decreased stimulus funding received during the first quarter of 2012 for projects like the Moab mill tailings project contributed significantly to the drop in revenue.
Partner Content
Jobs