“When issues are raised to [lab] management, it does not come across as being the honorable thing to do,” Rivera said to NS&D Monitor. “It comes across as stepping on someone’s toes.” Rivera said Livermore employees who raise questions are considered “combative” and those who make suggestions regarding lab facilities are considered “disruptive.” According to Rivera, “this is the language that they use to get rid of employees.” Lynda Seaver, spokeswoman for LLNL’s managing body, Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC, told NS&D Monitor that Rivera was terminated “due to myriad performance issues,” and that “his complaints of fraud, gross mismanagement, abuse of authority, retaliation, and on and on, are baseless.” Seaver said that the case “has been adjudicated by several outside agencies,” resulting in dismissal of Rivera’s appeal attempts. She added that “an administrative law judge determined Rivera was entitled to unemployment benefits,” but that “there was no ruling that the reasons given [for his termination] were false.”
Former Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) employee Anthony Rivera filed a complaint to Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz earlier this month alleging that he had been fired after reporting hazards at the lab to management. Rivera told NS&D Monitor that he was employed at the lab since 1984 and fired in October 2013, upon raising issues about the misuse of finances in certain accounts and the hazards at the High Explosives Application Facility (HEAF) where he worked for 16 years. The Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) dismissed a complaint Rivera filed last year on the matter, and in March 2015 DOE denied his appeal of the complaint dismissal. He appealed to Moniz this month under federal whistleblower protection provisions, requesting either full reinstatement in his previous position or a renewed OHA investigation of the firing.
Partner Content
Jobs