Nuclear Security & Deterrence Monitor Vol. 23 No. 16
Visit Archives | Return to Issue
PDF
Nuclear Security & Deterrence Monitor
Article 11 of 14
April 19, 2019

Global Strike Command Leader Expects Cost of New ICBM to Increase in Short Term

By Vivienne Machi

The leader of Air Force Global Strike Command expects the cost of the service’s new intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) to increase in the short term, he said April 17.

However, Gen. Timothy Ray is not concerned about the impact to the ongoing Ground-Based Strategic Deterrent (GBSD) program, as the cost will likely then go down after the service makes a source selection decision, he said Wednesday during a media roundtable event in Washington, D.C.

The expected raised cost will pay for an overhaul of the existing missile silos, and other infrastructure improvements, he said. Once those efforts are complete, the Air Force can use the upgraded facilities to house its new missiles, saving cost overall in the program.

“Our estimates are in the billions of savings over the lifespan of the weapon,” he added, noting several times that he considers the GBSD program to be a model for Air Force acquisition efforts, and touting its digital modeling and engineering processes that have sped up development.

“Typically, by this stage you would be on your second design cycle on this milestone,” he said. “We’re past nine with both contenders, and the insights are incredible.”

Boeing, which developed the Air Force’s current Minuteman III ICBMs, is competing with Northrop Grumman to build the next nuclear missile arsenal, expected to be fielded in the late 2020s.

In 2017, each vendor was awarded up to $359 million for a 36-month technology and risk reduction phase. The Air Force is expected to down-select to one vendor for the engineering and manufacturing development phase in 2020. The service’s fiscal year 2020 presidential budget request includes over $570 million in research, development, test and evaluation funding for the program, up from about $414 million enacted in FY ‘19.

The Air Force budgeted nearly $22 billion in research, development, test and engineering funds for the GBSD program through fiscal year 2024, including over $888 million that has already been spent, according to the service’s FY ’20 budget justification book. The Arms Control Association reported in 2017 that the GBSD program was expected to cost about $100 billion.

GBSD will use W87-1 warheads provided by the Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). The W87-1 warheads are refurbished W78 warheads. The agency renamed the warhead because it will use first-stage cores, or pits, similar to the pit for the existing W87 ICBM warhead.

NNSA is under the gun to make 80 war-ready W87-1 style pits a year, starting in 2030. The agency’s plan to produce pits at both the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico and the Savannah River Site in South Carolina has come under scrutiny in Congress. An study of the plan by a Pentagon-funded think tank this week tepidly declared the plan “potentially achievable.”

Under NNSA’s pit plan, Los Alamos would start cranking 10 war-ready W87-1 style pits a year by 2026. That would get some cores in the pipeline in time for the Defense Department to deploy GBSD missiles beginning in 2030 or so.

 

Dan Leone, staff reporter for Nuclear Security & Deterrence Monitor, contributed to this story from Washington. This story first appeared in NS&DM affiliate publication, Defense Daily.

Comments are closed.

Partner Content
Social Feed

NEW: Via public records request, I’ve been able to confirm reporting today that a warrant has been issued for DOE deputy asst. secretary of spent fuel and waste disposition Sam Brinton for another luggage theft, this time at Las Vegas’s Harry Reid airport. (cc: @EMPublications)

DOE spent fuel lead Brinton accused of second luggage theft.



by @BenjaminSWeiss, confirming today's reports with warrant from Las Vegas Metro PD.

Waste has been Emplaced! 🚮

We have finally begun emplacing defense-related transuranic (TRU) waste in Panel 8 of #WIPP.

Read more about the waste emplacement here: https://wipp.energy.gov/wipp_news_20221123-2.asp

Load More