More details about the Obama Administration’s alternate plutonium strategy are emerging, including plans to build a series of smaller facilities at Los Alamos National Laboratory to house capabilities that had been planned for the now-deferred Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement-Nuclear Facility. Los Alamos Director Charlie McMillan first mentioned the approach in February, but an April 8 letter from acting National Nuclear Security Administration chief Neile Miller and Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics and Nuclear Weapons Council Chairman Frank Kendall reveals new details about the concept, which they say will not only address capabilities that had been planned for CMRR-NF but also help address aging issues at Los Alamos’ Plutonium Facility. “The concept would provide means to transfer higher operational risk activities out of PF-4, thereby extending PF-4 operational lifetime while enabling production capacity enhancements and sufficient analytical support to production,” Miller and Kendall wrote in letters to the chairmen of the House and Senate Armed Services Committees. The committees had raised questions about the NNSA’s deferral of work on CMRR-NF and blocked the NNSA’s $120 million reprogramming request over the concerns. In their letters to Congress, Miller and Kendall called the reprogramming “critical” to achieving an interim capacity to produce 30 plutonium pits per year by 2021.
Miller and Kendall said the $120 million reprogramming is needed to further assess the “modular” approach to replacing CMRR-NF’s capabilities and to prepare Los Alamos’ Radiological Laboratory Utility Office Building (RLUOB) to play a larger role in small-sample analytical chemistry activities, which had been planned for CMRR-NF. It would also pay for the relocation of material characterization equipment from the lab’s existing Chemistry and Metallurgy Research building to PF-4, and the evaluation of design options for a material transfer tunnel between PF-4, RLUOB and the “modular” facilities. The “modular” facilities would be single-purpose buildings used for work like plutonium casting, Miller and Kendall wrote. The officials said that $4-6 million of the $120 million reprogramming request was needed for the Nuclear Weapons Council, the Pentagon’s Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation group, and Los Alamos to explore the “modular” approach this year. “This analysis will address the risks and benefits, pros and cons, and seek initial insights into the cost and schedule of modular acquisition,” the officials wrote.
Miller and Kendall also suggested in their letter that the deferral of work on CMRR-NF would allow the Administration to explore a facility that included the planned CMRR-NF capabilities as well as a replacement for Los Alamos’ aging Plutonium Facility. “Because the acquisition timeline for CMRR now overlaps the timeline to recapitalize the PF-4 facility, which is also aging, we have flexibility to explore an integrated and potentially more responsive approach to moving forward on the suite of support capabilities planned for CMRR-NF and to managing long-term pit manufacturing and related infrastructure,” the officials wrote.
Partner Content
Jobs