The National Nuclear Security Administration is reviewing the Government Accountability Office’s decision to uphold two protests of the agency’s Y-12/Pantex award to Bechtel-led Consolidated Nuclear Security and is keeping its options open, including ignoring the GAO’s recommendations. In a long-awaited decision on the $22.8 billion contract, the GAO yesterday ruled in favor of protests by teams led by Babcock & Wilcox and Fluor/Jacobs on grounds that “NNSA failed to meaningfully assess the majority of each offeror’s proposed cost savings, and based its source selection decision on the unsupported assumption that all cost savings proposed by every offeror would be achieved.” The GAO recommended that the NNSA make a new award after reopening the procurement and requesting more information on the proposed cost savings of each bidder while also evaluating those savings, but the agency is not bound to follow its recommendations. If NNSA chooses to ignore the GAO, the protesters are likely to take their case to federal court. “We appreciate the GAO’s advice and are currently reviewing their decision,” NNSA spokesman Josh McConaha said. “We’re going to take some time before settling on our path forward, but we are committed to reducing costs for the American taxpayers and strengthening our nuclear security capabilities at Pantex and Y-12.”
An NNSA official told NW&M Monitor that of 17 different arguments made by the protesters, 16 were rejected. The only challenge that was upheld had to do with the evaluation of the proposed cost savings. Bechtel-led CNS proposed $3.27 billion in cost savings over the life of the contract, which NNSA officials said played a large role in the team’s victory. The agency said it did not vet those cost savings, suggesting that it would do so during transition and that the CNS’ ability to earn fee and hold onto the contract was contingent on it delivering its proposed cost savings. “There are good options available, so I wouldn’t make any assumptions about what happens next,” the NNSA official told NW&M Monitor.
Bechtel spokesman Jason Bohne said the company would welcome the ability to provide additional information about its bid. “We believe that information will affirm that the NNSA made the right decision in picking CNS,” Bohne told NW&M Monitor. “We weren’t looking just to put a big [cost savings] number out there. There’s a very solid basis in that number and we’re very confident in it.” In a statement, B&W President and Chief Executive Officer Jim Ferland applauded the GAO’s decision. “B&W and our Nuclear Production Partners team believe the GAO’s decision supports our concerns about the initial award of this contract,” Ferland said. “While we await a final decision on the path forward from NNSA, B&W remains focused on operating both sites safely and securely.” Officials from Fluor/Jacobs did not respond to a request for comment.
Partner Content
Jobs