Nuclear Regulatory Commission kicked off efforts to address the ‘phantom four’ isotopes during a public hearing held in conjunction with the Waste Management Symposium in Phoenix, Ariz. last week. The consistent over-reporting of Carbon-14, Technetium-99, Iodine-99 and Cesium-137 came up as an issue as the NRC began work on the ongoing Site Specific Assessment rulemaking. Stakeholders told the agency that allowing generators to use alternative methods for measuring the isotopes’ concentration, more sophisticated manifests that allow non-scientists to accurately estimate the actual content of radiological shipments, and prioritizing accuracy over excessive conservatism would help disposal sites get a more realistic picture of the amount of certain isotopes they are receiving. “From an activity standpoint of what we’re manifesting, it could be 100 times greater than what is present,” Billy Cox with the Electric Power Research Institute said at the March 1 meeting. “We need an accurate activity value on the manifest. That’s important, so we’re not biasing the disposal site inventory adversely or positively, but it’s also important from a performance assessment perspective that we have an accurate representation.”
This is pivotal for the radioactive waste industry, stakeholders pressed upon NRC staff, because disposal sites are not plentiful, and they have limits on certain curies they can dispose of over their lifetime. Over-reporting results in unused space, and orphaned waste. “When you’re reporting for compliance, accuracy isn’t the important part. But adopting that attitude in the industry is now having a cost that’s unintended,” Lisa Edwards, senior project manager with EPRI said. Paul Black with Neptune agreed, saying: “Aiming for compliance isn’t the only end point we need to aim for. We have few waste disposal facilities we should be optimizing the use of them and compliance alone isn’t enough for that. We need the right data, not conservative data, to help do that.” NRC staff outlined their public outreach plan on the issue, including webinars in April and May, a draft to be published in late summer or early fall, and a final rule toward the end of 2013 or early 2014.
Partner Content
Jobs