A Babcock & Wilcox-led team has three times protested the National Nuclear Security Administration’s actions on the Y-12/Pantex procurement, and a senior B&W official yesterday said the company supports scrapping the entire procurement and starting over, perhaps competing the two management and operating contracts separately. “We think there’s merit in DOE considering just calling time out and going back to the drawing board and rebidding,” Marshall Cohen, B&W’s Vice President for Government Affairs and Communication, told the Knoxville News Sentinel yesterday. Cohen was in East Tennessee for several days discussing B&W and the Y-12/Pantex procurement with industry and community leaders, according to the News Sentinel. “We’ve talked with people, and we’ve said here’s what we think. We think the idea of a rebid has merit. That’s what we think,” Cohen said. “I’ve said that the last couple of days throughout the community. That’s what we think. We think that’s a good option that ought to be considered. Now what does all that mean, detail-wise? What does it mean economy-wise? I don’t know. How fast could DOE turn it around? I don’t know.”
Cohen’s comments came as the Government Accountability is considering B&W-led Nuclear Production Partners’ latest protest. Nuclear Production Partners filed its third protest of the procurement in November after the NNSA selected Bechtel-led Consolidated Nuclear Security as the winner of the contract for the second time. The GAO is expected to rule on the protest by Feb. 28. “The question is what does DOE kind of do, want to do,” he said. “Is its No. 1 priority cost savings? Which it was. There is some feeling, how viable—valid—is that as a top priority right now in the context of today’s world? … And that’s a judgment that people have to make … If you did a rebid, it would require DOE to reconsider how they want to do that. What cost savings make sense? Cost savings versus mission? The impact of cost savings on the economy and if you separate out the bids?”
Partner Content