DOE Cuts Uranium Transfers Under Latest Secretarial Determination

By Mike Nartker

Uranium Mining Industry Gives Move ‘Mixed Reviews’ Kenneth Fletcher WC Monitor 5/8/2015 In a move that is expected to impact funding for cleanup work at the Portsmouth site, the Department of Energy is reducing the amount of excess uranium it…

Thank you for visiting
Weapons Complex Monitor!

You must be logged in as a subscriber to view this page.

Not a subscriber? Click here to sign up for a FREE six-week trial and receive access to this article, along with our entire archives.

Please contact [email protected] if you are unable to login.

Forgot Password?

Comments are closed.

Table of Contents

B&W CEO Expresses Optimism for Future of Company’s Technical Services Group

By Mike Nartker
New Report Provides Insight Into Bechtel’s Estimates for Completing Key Portions of WTP

By Mike Nartker
DOE’s Carlsbad Field Office Has Trouble Filling New WIPP Oversight Positions

By Mike Nartker
INTERVIEW: Sen. Lamar Alexander

By Mike Nartker
Prior to Electrical Accident at Los Alamos, DOE Had Already Launched Investigation

By Mike Nartker
CHPRC Facing Lawsuit from Subcontractor over K Basin Annex Project

By Mike Nartker
BWCS Not Yet Setting Firm Schedule for Full Restart of Portsmouth DUF6 Operations

By Mike Nartker
DOE Cuts Uranium Transfers Under Latest Secretarial Determination

By Mike Nartker
U-233 Shipments from Oak Ridge to Nevada Moving Ahead

By Mike Nartker
DOE: No Indication Poneman Violated Ethics Rules in Seeking Centrus Job

By Mike Nartker
At Richland

By Mike Nartker
At Los Alamos

By Mike Nartker
At Oak Ridge

By Mike Nartker
Wrap Up

By Mike Nartker