Key Opinion in SRNS Overcharging Suit Still Sitting with Civilian Board

By Staff Reports

An independent opinion that could help determine the outcome of a federal lawsuit claiming a Savannah River Site contractor overcharged the federal government by $5 million is still being decided after nearly three years, according to a status report recently filed…

Thank you for visiting
Weapons Complex Monitor!

You must be logged in as a subscriber to view this page.

Not a subscriber? Click here to sign up for a FREE six-week trial and receive access to this article, along with our entire archives.

Please contact [email protected] if you are unable to login.

Forgot Password?

Comments are closed.

Table of Contents

Washington State, DOE Begin Hanford Waste Talks

By Wayne Barber
Brouillette In Line to Replace Perry as Energy Secretary

By Dan Leone
Senate Armed Services Chair Prepping ‘Skinny’ NDAA

By Staff Reports
Salt Waste Facility Startup at Savannah River Site Pushed Back to Early 2020

By Staff Reports
Hanford Support-Services Vendor Should Receive Six-Month Extension

By Staff Reports
GAO Offers Plan To Make Energy Dept. Cleanup More Risk-Based

By Wayne Barber
Key Opinion in SRNS Overcharging Suit Still Sitting with Civilian Board

By Staff Reports
WIPP’s New Volume Calculation Significantly Increases Disposal Levels, Group Says

By Wayne Barber
AECOM Provides Detail on Sale of Government Service Unit

By Wayne Barber
Third-Party Firm Almost Ready to Start Sampling Around Portsmouth Site

By Staff Reports
Firm Gets Dry Storage Contract at Hanford

By Staff Reports
Wrap Up: Atkins Wins Extension to Research for Hanford Waste Processing

By Staff Reports