PERs Highlight Very Different Years for Los Alamos, Livermore in FY 2014

By Todd Jacobson

Todd Jacobson NS&D Monitor 1/23/2015 National Nuclear Security Administration officials were highly critical of Los Alamos National Laboratory management in the lab’s recently released Fiscal Year 2014 Performance Evaluation Review, but had plenty of…

Thank you for visiting
Nuclear Security & Deterrence Monitor!

You must be logged in as a subscriber to view this page.

Not a subscriber? Click here to sign up for a FREE six-week trial and receive access to this article, along with our entire archives.

Please contact [email protected] if you are unable to login.

Forgot Password?

Comments are closed.

Table of Contents

Head of Air Force A10 Shares Details of GBSD, Takes on Modernization Critics

By Brian Bradley
At Oak Ridge

By Todd Jacobson
MOX Work Not Affected by Russian Withdrawal From Nuclear Security Cooperation

By Todd Jacobson
Lawmakers React as Air Force Approves Powder River Training Complex Expansion

By Todd Jacobson
Dept. of Justice Investigating Sandia Lobbying Efforts

By Todd Jacobson
Ohio-Class Replacement Could Lag in Stealth if Program Doesn’t Secure Funding

By Todd Jacobson
New HASC Chairman Opposed to Major Recommendation of NNSA Panel

By Todd Jacobson
New CBO Study Shows $7 Billion Decrease in 10-Year Nuke Cost Estimates

By Todd Jacobson
PERs Highlight Very Different Years for Los Alamos, Livermore in FY 2014

By Todd Jacobson
Bulletin of Atomic Scientists Moves ‘Doomsday Clock’ Ahead Two Ticks

By Todd Jacobson
Scowcroft: U.S. Should Closely Consider Nuclear Structure in Context of Recent Russian Actions

By Todd Jacobson
DOE Office of Enforcement to Investigate ORNL Radiological Release

By Todd Jacobson
DOE IG Pulls OST Report to Review Accuracy of Findings

By Todd Jacobson
Alexander Officially Named Chairman of Senate E&W Approps

By Todd Jacobson
Conference on Disarmament Convenes in Geneva

By Todd Jacobson
At Pantex

By Todd Jacobson
Wrap Up

By Todd Jacobson