Wind vs. CCS in Saskatchewan

SaskWind, a Saskatchewan, Canada-based wind energy advocacy group, is at odds with the national government, which it says has hidden the effect on electric costs of its Boundary Dan Unit 3 carbon capture and storage project. Canada’s Parliamentary Budget Office released a report in April outlining the cost of electricity from the CCS project. “In short: the report, despite leaving out some major costs and also making some generous assumptions on future revenues, found that CCS doubles the cost of electricity. Nonetheless, that result was buried and the report bizarrely concluded that CCS ‘holds great potential,’” according to a Friday release from SaskWind.

The group has responded to the report in a letter to the Parliamentary Budget Office stating that “[i]t is not clear why the report’s conclusions do not even mention wind despite its enormous potential. Numerous statements about the limits of wind due to baseload/grid stability/backup have no basis in fact or study.”

In This Issue

More on This Topic


A grid of national flags from countries around the world, representing international cooperation.

Democrats move to block U.S.-Saudi nuclear agreement

Congressional Democrats have introduced a resolution seeking to block a U.S.-Saudi civil nuclear cooperation agreement, citing concerns about uranium enrichment and limits on international inspections. Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.), the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, along with Reps. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.), John Garamendi (D-Calif.), and Don Beyer (D-Va.), introduced the joint resolution […]