Correction

By ExchangeMonitor

The story “DOE takes comment on Hanford 5-year plan” [Weapons Complex Monitor, Vol. 34, No. 39] should have said the document covers the Hanford Site over five years, between fiscal 2024 and 2028.

Thank you for visiting
Weapons Complex Monitor!

You must be logged in as a subscriber to view this page.

Not a subscriber? Click here to sign up for a FREE six-week trial and receive access to this article, along with our entire archives.

Please contact [email protected] if you are unable to login.

Forgot Password?

Comments are closed.

Table of Contents

Hanford’s pre-treated waste might not meet vit plant criteria

By Wayne Barber
Small, woman-owned Virginia biz claims $208M Hanford occupational health contract

By Staff Reports
DOE kicks off clean energy market research at Idaho, Savannah River

By Wayne Barber
WIPP continues brisk shipment pace in September

By ExchangeMonitor
Holtec exec upbeat on nuclear operations; USEA panelists discuss small modular reactors

By Wayne Barber
GAO wants Army Corps to get a handle on rising FUSRAP liability

By Wayne Barber
9th Circuit panel considers if Sandia scientist’s retirement was voluntary

By Wayne Barber
Wrap Up: Fluor unit lands UK contract, indictment alleges nuclear parts kickbacks, study out on culling wild pigs around SRS

By ExchangeMonitor
No new recliner: 30 minutes with Jessie Hill Roberson, DNFSB, retired

By Wayne Barber
Correction

By ExchangeMonitor