USW wants to ensure worker protections don’t slip in advanced reactors

By Wayne Barber

While the United Steel Workers (USW) union supports advanced nuclear projects for its members, it wants to ensure that employee health and safety remain protected at advanced reactor projects
That’s the gist of supplemental comments filed with the Department…

Thank you for visiting
RadWaste Monitor!

You must be logged in as a subscriber to view this page.

Not a subscriber? Click here to sign up for a FREE six-week trial and receive access to this article, along with our entire archives.

Please contact clientservices@accessintel.com if you are unable to login.

Forgot Password?

Comments are closed.

Table of Contents

New England, other states show growing interest in nuclear power

By Trey Rorie
White House fiscal 2027 request would trim NRC, DOE-NE toplines

By ExchangeMonitor
OPG submits operating license for first Darlington SMR

By ExchangeMonitor
Palisades Plant inches closer to restart; SMR plans advance

By ExchangeMonitor
Advanced nuclear companies confident of meeting July 4 deadline

By ExchangeMonitor
Constellation confirms 2027 restart target for former Three Mile Island reactor

By ExchangeMonitor
Amentum-led JV awarded $406 million contract for UK SMR program

By ExchangeMonitor
Utah picks site for potential DOE nuclear lifecycle campus

By ExchangeMonitor
Urenco USA brings fourth cascade online at N.M. plant

By ExchangeMonitor
Entergy Louisiana, Meta look to add more nuclear to power $10 billion data center

By ExchangeMonitor
USW wants to ensure worker protections don’t slip in advanced reactors

By Wayne Barber
New Hampshire considers more nuclear in its energy future

By ExchangeMonitor
Kentucky invests in GLE’s Paducah laser enrichment facility

By ExchangeMonitor
Round Up: NASA’s Artemis II launching; Air Force RFI for SMRs; Holtec SMR-300 UK makes progress; NRC makes two personnel moves

By ExchangeMonitor