DOE Plan on U-233 Options Six Months Late, No Sign of Resolution on Shipping Material to Nevada

By Mike Nartker

Kenneth Fletcher WC Monitor 10/17/2014 With no time frame yet as to when uranium-233 from Oak Ridge may be sent to the Nevada National Security Site for disposal, the Department of Energy still has not submitted a Congressionally-mandated analysis that was due…

Thank you for visiting
Weapons Complex Monitor!

You must be logged in as a subscriber to view this page.

Not a subscriber? Click here to sign up for a FREE six-week trial and receive access to this article, along with our entire archives.

Please contact [email protected] if you are unable to login.

Forgot Password?

Comments are closed.

Table of Contents

Correction

By Mike Nartker
New Survey Results Show Increase in DNFSB Staff Dissatisfaction

By Mike Nartker
Union Has Concerns As Paducah Plant Wraps Up Transition to Fluor

By Mike Nartker
EDITORIAL: Contractor Performance Ratings Should Not Be Kept Hidden

By Mike Nartker
INTERA to File GAO Protest Over Navarro’s Win of New NNSS Enviro. Contract

By Mike Nartker
DOE Plan on U-233 Options Six Months Late, No Sign of Resolution on Shipping Material to Nevada

By Mike Nartker
IG Lists Deferred Maintenance as ‘Special Concern’ In DOE FY’15 Management Challenges

By Mike Nartker
DOE Releases Final RFP for Oak Ridge TWPC Contract

By Mike Nartker
South Carolina Urges DOE to Increase Waste Processing at SRS Through New Tech.

By Mike Nartker
EPA Begins Fining DOE over Delays in Hanford K Basin Sludge Cleanup

By Mike Nartker
At River Protection

By Mike Nartker
At Richland

By Mike Nartker
At Oak Ridge

By Mike Nartker