Some Potential Bidders on New Hanford 222-S Lab Contract Wonder if Tank Farms Contractor Has OCI

By Mike Nartker

Mike Nartker
WC Monitor
7/3/2014
Some potential bidders on the new contract to provide analytical and testing services at Hanford’s 222-S Laboratory appear to be worried that Hanford tank farms contractor Washington River Protection Solutions may have an…

Thank you for visiting
Weapons Complex Monitor!

You must be logged in as a subscriber to view this page.

Not a subscriber? Click here to sign up for a FREE six-week trial and receive access to this article, along with our entire archives.

Please contact clientservices@accessintel.com if you are unable to login.

Forgot Password?

Comments are closed.

Table of Contents

URS May Seek Up to $650,000 From DOE for Executive Testimony at Whistleblower Hearing

By Mike Nartker
Industry Officials Question DOE Plans for Post-FY 2015 Idaho Work

By Mike Nartker
DOE Nominees Pending Confirmation Continue Waiting Game

By Mike Nartker
DOE Releases Draft RFP for Portsmouth Infrastructure Support Services Contract

By Mike Nartker
Status of Inspector General Investigation of DNFSB Management Unclear

By Mike Nartker
WIPP Initial Cleanup Phase to Begin

By Mike Nartker
Second Deadline Passes with No Resolution on Talks over Hanford Consent Decree

By Mike Nartker
New Mexico Denies Los Alamos Milestone Extension Requests

By Mike Nartker
S.M. Stoller Gets New Contract Extension for LM Support Services

By Mike Nartker
DOE Indicates Multi-Month Contract Extension Likely for Incumbent Oak Ridge TRU Facility Contractor

By Mike Nartker
Some Potential Bidders on New Hanford 222-S Lab Contract Wonder if Tank Farms Contractor Has OCI

By Mike Nartker
U.K. Cleanup Focus

By Mike Nartker
At River Protection

By Mike Nartker
At Richland

By Mike Nartker
At Idaho

By Mike Nartker
At Los Alamos

By Mike Nartker
At Oak Ridge

By Mike Nartker
At Savannah River

By Mike Nartker
Wrap Up: In DOE, In The DNFSB, In The Industry

By Mike Nartker
Correction

By Mike Nartker